bip 110

Attention over time

7-day rolling share of analyzed posts/comments mentioning this entity · 90 daily points ending 2026-07-18

Final complete day: 2026-07-18. Attention was 1.3% — this entity appeared in 83 of 6,464 analyzed posts/comments in the seven days ending that day (142 mentions).

Each point is a seven-day rolling window of complete UTC days; a point is comparable only when at least 100 analyzed posts or comments fall inside it. A day with no analyzed records counts as zero; missing coverage is marked and never shown as zero. The series ends at the latest complete analyzed day — it never extends into the current incomplete day. How attention is measured.

Recent mentions

1. 2026-07-18 18:44 UTCComment

   So I don't understand.. would bip110 be a good thing since it reduces all that crap spam s-coins and altcoins up the yinyang and non important data bs? Why would anyone vote against it? There's already thousands of other coins that do that, if not more?

2. 2026-07-18 17:05 UTCComment

   While that is true that is just a small part of the entire picture of how forks work in Bitcoin as both soft forks and hard forks are ruleset changes. Hard forks are rule relaxations so they needs overwhelming consensus to be activated without creating a new token, they are not **backwards nor forward** compatible at all, they are essentially new rules that requiere a new software in order to understand them. Soft forks in the other hand are rule tightenings, meaning that old nodes don't need to update in order to accept them, they are backwards compatible but that doesn't mean they are forward compatible, they can be if the newer rules don't restrict anything from the past rules. They also need **sufficient** support. In the case of BIP-110 while it is true that it is a soft-fork, it is **not** a forward compatible, your old node can and will accept BIP-110 sognaling and enforcing blocks, in fact it already does, but soon BIP-110 signaling nodes will reject blocks that don't signal for BIP-110, meaning that the moment a non-signaling block hits them they will reject them and be forked out of the network expecting **exclusively** BIP-110 blocks. They also reject some already existing rules, meaning that even if a block is signaling for BIP-110 they just need to include one transaction considered valid in the ruleset we have today but invalid in theirs to reject the whole block while the main chain accepts it. The BIP110 fork simulator by Orange Surf from mempool.space might be better at helping you visualize it than any words I write will ever be, it includes BIP-110 today hashrate and you can calculate the chainspliy using it and other hashrate levels.

3. 2026-07-18 15:30 UTCComment

   BitcoinCore, the company that writes the standard bitcoin software, seems to have been accepting money from companies that want to use the bitcoin blockchain for non monetary uses, and has made several changes that favour these companies. Some node-runners aren't very happy about having their hardware exploited by these private companies. BIP-110 is an attempt to fight back and revert the changes.

4. 2026-07-18 13:12 UTCComment

   Here's one scenario: under bip110, spammers will be forced to use more block space, creating bigger demand for the space, rising the tx fees for everyone, miners will make more sats.

5. 2026-07-18 11:31 UTCComment

   Read up about bip110. If it forks, one chain will tank…