decade

Attention over time

7-day rolling share of analyzed posts/comments mentioning this entity · 90 daily points ending 2026-10-08

Final complete day: 2026-10-08. Attention was 0.2% — this entity appeared in 22 of 9,401 analyzed posts/comments in the seven days ending that day (23 mentions).

Each point is a seven-day rolling window of complete UTC days; a point is comparable only when at least 100 analyzed posts or comments fall inside it. A day with no analyzed records counts as zero; missing coverage is marked and never shown as zero. The series ends at the latest complete analyzed day — it never extends into the current incomplete day. How attention is measured.

Recent mentions

1. 2026-10-08 00:36 UTCComment

   When I think about ease of recovery, my philosophy is: the number of times you spend doing a thing should be the deciding factor in how easy you need to make that thing if there are other tradoffs involved (like size and durability). Looking back on my own offline wallet backups, I can say I've only ever gone through seed phrase recovery just twice in the past decade. Once was to prove to myself that the wallet could be recovered from my backup and the other time was to prove to my wife that it worked (while walking her through the process). For something I only realistically need to do a couple times a decade, I don't really care if it's slightly complicated if that gets me a smaller form factor and massive durability. Now, If I was recovering wallets from backup seed phrases all the damned time...I would definitely want the medium and recovery process to be much easier and streamlined.

2. 2026-10-07 12:49 UTCComment

   they will end up with nothing and come to ppl with Bitcoin with their arms outstretched, after decades of refusing to listen to reason and belittling those who did the rational thing. Us being moral creatures, will be beset by feelings of mercy and sumpathy. But according to your post, you are the low IQ low moral exemption to the rule, so whatever.

3. 2026-10-06 14:55 UTCPost

   OP_RETURN: how Bitcoin's data output went from a 40-byte cap to 80 bytes to uncapped, with the blocks to check it - Before 2014, anyone who wanted to put data on chain encoded it as fake addresses, and those outputs sit in every node's UTXO set forever. Bitcoin Core 0.9.0 added OP\_RETURN as a prunable alternative, first with a 40-byte cap, raised to 80 in 0.11. That ceiling stood for a decade. Bitcoin Core 30.0 raised the default to 100,000 bytes in October 2025. None of it is consensus, only relay policy. I wrote this up for ChainQuery with the RPC calls shown so you can rerun them on your own node: block 350,000 next to block 840,000 with getblockstats, the Counterparty, Omni and Open Assets envelopes, and the VeriBlock episode, when one project was pushing up to a fifth of daily transactions through this one opcode. For the short version of what the opcode is:

4. 2026-10-06 04:15 UTCComment

   Short term, whether you’re trading BTC, Apple, Nvidia, Walmart, or some shotcoin, you can be right but also lose money. Think some macro event or announcement could happen in your favor, well markers can stay dumb longer than you think. Only play the long term. BTC goes up because people have been fleeing fiat money for decades and it’s getting increasingly bad.

5. 2026-10-05 16:07 UTCComment

   Most people aren't aware that major global financial institutions are slowing ETF purchases to lower the fiat price on exchanges so they can flush leverage and stack on the sly. They have invested billions to lay the rails for blockchain's integration into the global financial infrastructure. They make plans for decades. It means your bitcoin is safe and once the supply squeeze hits... moon!