long

Attention over time

7-day rolling share of analyzed posts/comments mentioning this entity · 90 daily points ending 2026-08-02

Final complete day: 2026-08-02. Attention was 0.1% — this entity appeared in 11 of 9,589 analyzed posts/comments in the seven days ending that day (12 mentions).

Each point is a seven-day rolling window of complete UTC days; a point is comparable only when at least 100 analyzed posts or comments fall inside it. A day with no analyzed records counts as zero; missing coverage is marked and never shown as zero. The series ends at the latest complete analyzed day — it never extends into the current incomplete day. How attention is measured.

Recent mentions

1. 2026-08-01 07:25 UTCComment

   I found MD2 terrible with 6 players. It's just so long it becomes unfun.

2. 2026-07-31 13:25 UTCComment

   Yes, mostly just because the game says to play that way. I wouldn’t be against playing best of one but the game isn’t that long so I am fine playing best 2/3

3. 2026-07-30 15:42 UTCComment

   My daughter loves Kyoto No Neko. We are working through all the scenarios. Setup is a bit long for the game. With 2 players, it’s very short but playing with the full 4 makes it a longer experience. I picked up dragon parks but we haven’t tried it yet. I had another game from the same publisher and my daughter enjoyed it.

4. 2026-07-29 17:25 UTCComment

   I really like SL and nothing to do with CoB. Its a nice mix of different games mechanic but there are no rolling dices for examples. Very puzzling and handling the cards and how and when to use it its super interesting. It could be a very long game with 4 players but also depends on the players. Solo game its easy to handle and fun to play.

5. 2026-07-29 13:34 UTCComment

   I have Sweet Lands and have played it a few times. It is probably one of my heaviest games and long, but I enjoy it. The gameplay itself is simple (place a worker and spend a card or pay to play a card), but there’s many different decisions, tracks, and strategies you can try to win. The theme is a plus for me. Rosalie is gorgeous, but I felt I needed only one very heavy and fairly long game, and opted to pass. Especially because Rosalie’s garden + robot themes is a no from me (I am not a fan of robots or science fiction). My negatives for Sweet Lands are: \- No insert for their 100+ components. They bragged about a ton of components prior/during the campaign and did not budge on requests for an insert at any point. There’s an unofficial 3D printed one you can get that is great. \- The table print is huge. Big main board plus two player boards and a third track for players. And you need space to set out cards and tuck cards below the player board. \- My boyfriend’s complaint is that the theme is loose because the resources are still wood, stone, etc. and bland cubes despite the buildings looking like food and there being cookie bunnies. I think he’s just nitpicking to complain and what he’s saying inconsequential. (But hey if that’s his only complaint I’ll take it). Also yes the upgrade is pointless. It’s just sleeves (that will probably wear fast) and meeples that genuinely don’t have a use. You can make one up but it’s a complete afterthought. I wish they did a proper insert instead of those unnecessary bits. (Edit: And also the card deck is huge. I can’t imagine even wanting to sleeve it and how bigger it will be.)