player 1

Attention over time

7-day rolling share of analyzed posts/comments mentioning this entity · 90 daily points ending 2026-08-02

Final complete day: 2026-08-02. Attention was 0.3% — this entity appeared in 30 of 9,589 analyzed posts/comments in the seven days ending that day (70 mentions).

Each point is a seven-day rolling window of complete UTC days; a point is comparable only when at least 100 analyzed posts or comments fall inside it. A day with no analyzed records counts as zero; missing coverage is marked and never shown as zero. The series ends at the latest complete analyzed day — it never extends into the current incomplete day. How attention is measured.

Recent mentions

1. 2026-08-01 13:46 UTCComment

   If player 1 passed, I don’t think you can steal from a player that has passed. They are out of the round.

2. 2026-08-01 08:48 UTCComment

   Apologies for not being clearer in my original post, There where 3 rounds of cards drawn, Round 1 Player 1 got a 12, player 2 got a 5, Player 3 got a 13 Round 2 player 1 stayed, player 2 got a steal and stole player 1 12, player 3 got a zero Round 3 player 2 got a 5 so bust player 3 got a -8 and put it in front of player 1( who had no cards in front of them) player 3 them got 5 card on the bounce to get a flip 7 I "think" we played it wrong and player 3 shouldn't have given player 1 the minus 8 card. Hope that makes sense

3. 2026-08-01 08:04 UTCComment

   Apologies for not being clearer in my original post, There where 3 rounds of cards drawn, Round 1 Player 1 got a 12, player 2 got a 5, Player 3 got a 13 Round 2 player 1 stayed, player 2 got a steal and stole player 1 12, player 3 got a zero Round 3 player 2 got a 5 so bust player 3 got a -8 and put it in front of player 1( who had no cards in front of them) player 3 them got 5 card on the bounce to get a flip 7 I "think" we played it wrong and player 3 shouldn't have given player 1 the minus 8 card. Hope that makes sense

4. 2026-07-30 19:49 UTCComment

   Ya well no one expected player 2 to be an unbreakable ally, even player 1 told me they were surprised by it and expected them to betray them once they were winning, player 1 and 2 allied at the start to do a specific task and just never broke it afterwards And due to the board state, I couldn’t check player 1 myself since player 2 was stopping me And player 3 had no chance at beating player 1 or helping me fight player 2 since they just kept losing every battle and in a game like this, winning just snowballs you into winning more and vice versa, usually that’s offset by players ganging up one people but that just didn’t happen this game I played this game a few times and other similar games and almost no one creates an unbreakable alliance since it will always doom one player to losing and almost no one I play with doesn’t care about winning, this time was pretty unique

5. 2026-07-30 18:53 UTCComment

   Ya I kinda get your point, it’s pretty common for one player to manipulate another player into an alliance that they pitch as “mutually beneficial” but then after the goal is done it’s quite clear one player got much more then the other player I guess my issue with this situation is that player 2 never once really tried to win, all the points they got were kinda random, they never did any specific action to specificity gain points or try to attack player 1 who has a significant lead even though it was clear they would win if they didn’t I’m perfectly fine with kingmaking when it’s like the final turn and you have no chance to win so you decide to fully support one of the two players who going to win next turn, however it wasn’t like player 2 checking player 1 would have immediately given the win to someone else given the fact we were all low on the score board except for player 1. I jusy didnt think someone would play a game like without trying to win at all Most of the time people make alliances while both trying to still win and eventually the alliance falls apart because one of them gets close to winning while the other one puts a stop to them so they still have a chance to win themselves , that’s how most of my games played and they were always fun for everyone, this game left 2/4 of us kinda frustrated and even player 1 told me how weird they thought player 2 was playing and even said they probably should have told them to stop supporting them so much, Mid game since he even felt like there alliance was super 1 sided