solo

Attention over time

7-day rolling share of analyzed posts/comments mentioning this entity · 90 daily points ending 2026-08-02

Final complete day: 2026-08-02. Attention was 0.4% — this entity appeared in 37 of 9,589 analyzed posts/comments in the seven days ending that day (46 mentions).

Each point is a seven-day rolling window of complete UTC days; a point is comparable only when at least 100 analyzed posts or comments fall inside it. A day with no analyzed records counts as zero; missing coverage is marked and never shown as zero. The series ends at the latest complete analyzed day — it never extends into the current incomplete day. How attention is measured.

Recent mentions

1. 2026-08-02 22:00 UTCPost

   Looking on how to make a "campaign" with just the base box - Started playing Too Many Bones recently and I think I have the mechanics down well. I know how to utilize Picket and Patches as two-handed solo and want to explore the idea of doing a "campaign", except I only have the base box and don't have the money to buy more of this game. I looked online and all I could find was extending the amount of days I go through and using three different tyrants, one after the other. Does anyone have any advice to make it more "dynamic" than this? I'm okay with doing three tyrants, but I'm afraid it'll fall flat. Should I do like 30 days total and use three tyrants, but add up the progress points needed to fight the tyrants and then "use up" those points to fight a tyrant? This would make me fight all types of baddies which would make them weaker, like Orks being stronger when other Orks are on the battlefield. I could set up for a specific tyrant and spend the points to face them and then carry over my leftover progress points but that could also be broken. And should I do like a final battle, maybe with all tyrants in a battle once all three are defeated or add a special mechanic? I don't know. I'm just trying to figure out how to extend a game session. Also, do you think I'd have a better time adding Tantrum in and play three-handed since it'll be longer? I have an area I play that's tucked away so I don't have to worry about playing it in one sitting. I know I'm limited with just the base box but I would love any thoughts that could help me with this.

2. 2026-08-02 14:08 UTCComment

   I’ve been playing this solo over and over this week (and only beaten your score once, so either you’re pretty good or I’m pretty bad). Edit: or you misunderstood the scoring. It’s such a relaxing puzzle solo- and is literally the first game I played solo “to learn,” then kept playing it throughout the week. I’m reluctant to play it multiplayer- adding multiplayer seems like it would add tension and conflict in a game that is so relaxing single player, it seems like a step back. Any thoughts from people who have played it both solo and multiplayer?

3. 2026-08-02 14:02 UTCComment

   It’s a lovely little game :) great at solo as well

4. 2026-08-01 22:08 UTCComment

   How does she feel about paw patrol? It might be a little young for her, but if she has a younger sibling I highly recommend: paw patrol world. I have 4 kids 8f, 6m, 4m, 8months m. They all love playing it together. My oldest likes doing the missions solo or with me and her brothers like to just run and drive around

5. 2026-08-01 14:53 UTCComment

   I agree that playing on Steam is perhaps the most efficient way to play if going solo, but it's not that much of a table hog. Quest for El Dorado is an actual tablehog.