dog

Attention over time

7-day rolling share of analyzed posts/comments mentioning this entity · 90 daily points ending 2026-10-10

Final complete day: 2026-10-10. Attention was 2.4% — this entity appeared in 188 of 7,834 analyzed posts/comments in the seven days ending that day (357 mentions).

Each point is a seven-day rolling window of complete UTC days; a point is comparable only when at least 100 analyzed posts or comments fall inside it. A day with no analyzed records counts as zero; missing coverage is marked and never shown as zero. The series ends at the latest complete analyzed day — it never extends into the current incomplete day. How attention is measured.

Recent mentions

1. 2026-10-10 19:21 UTCComment

   Don’t pet that dog

2. 2026-10-08 16:01 UTCComment

   So, there are a few different kinds of this 'art form' if you can call plastering thousands of machine made, difficult to remove, industrial stickers all over every inch of public space like a maniac. You have: 1. Advertising (yay, corporate!) 2. Religious ('Ye must repent for he is coming' - again) 3. Political (I remember the 'Dump Koch' stickers back in the 80's, but oddly have never once seen a 'Dump Trump' sticker) 4. Conspiracy or hate agenda (Covid/birds etc. is not real or some racist garbage) 5. Whatever this **dog pee\* sticker culture** is really about (Hint: it's self promotion for self-obsessed narcissists - While seeing 'Kilroy was here' during WWII might have mildly entertained bored troops in an oblique foreign war zone, this 'Kest Gak' visual pollution sort of nonsense does little to improve anything at all in 2026 NYC) *\* When a dog marks a fire hydrant, it is called urine marking or scent marking or even pee-mail. This behavior is a way for dogs to communicate and establish territory. Sticker-culture is like that, just slightly less worse than a thankfully now nearly dead form of vandalism called scratchitti.* Now of the 5 types, I can at least get behind some of the political stuff, even if I don't agree with it, as long that it is factual and makes you stop and think, and not some silly slogan or derisive slop. Unfortunately, that sort of thing is extremely uncommon, as it seems that few people in the US want to stop and think these days. But I would love if anyone who really likes this sort of sticker novelty can tell me that the time and energy and money spent by these people to just further their addiction in promoting their sticker names is worth it. The arrests, the visual pollution, the effort and money required to clean up afterwards, what is it all for? To promote one very self-obsessed guy so he can see his stickers slapped on every surface in the city? Why? I may get it if you are putting some actual artistic sticker up that you spent some time hand designing in a place where it is welcome and somehow manages to improve the view, (I've seen a few of those) but none of what was shown in this segment did any of that.

3. 2026-10-08 03:34 UTCComment

   It's so rarely if ever enforced, 99% of people don't even know about it. If they arrest someone for bringing a dog on the train the whole car will likely turn against the cop, which is absurd.

4. 2026-10-08 03:32 UTCComment

   Dogs are fucking expensive to take care of even right now, so we're already in a place where dogs are only for the privileged.

5. 2026-10-08 03:31 UTCComment

   "Where tf is the empathy" I have empathy for the dog. But the owner got a dog and that comes with responsibilities. Having a pet is a privilege, not a right. People need to act like it. Dogs in trains need to be in a carrier or you have to figure out another option. That's the law, and it was the law before that dog was born. If there's not enough infrastructure for the dog, get a cat or a fish tank. It's not that complicated (service animals aside)