WIO

gender affirming care

SERVICE

Evidence in r/nyc — New York

Trend support

Rising+0.2 pp
Current seven-day window
Current 2026-10-04 → 2026-10-10
Comparison seven-day window
Comparison 2026-09-27 → 2026-10-03
Distinct-document support
Seen in 20 current vs 1 comparison posts/comments
Mentions
26 current vs 1 mentions

Windows are complete UTC days compared with the preceding seven. How trends are measured.

Also Mentioned 44 times in the most-discussed range 2026-09-10 → 2026-10-10 — frequency, not a trend.

Attention over time

7-day rolling share of analyzed posts/comments mentioning this entity · 90 daily points ending 2026-10-10

Final complete day: 2026-10-10. Attention was 0.3% — this entity appeared in 20 of 7,834 analyzed posts/comments in the seven days ending that day (26 mentions).

0%1.0%Jul 13Aug 26Oct 10

Hover, touch, or focus the chart (Tab) and use the arrow keys — each point is one seven-day window.

View all 90 data points (semantic table)
Week endingSeven-day rangeStatusPrevalenceSeen inMentionsAnalyzed
2026-07-132026-07-07 → 2026-07-13Comparable0.0%0 of 6,10706,107
2026-07-142026-07-08 → 2026-07-14Comparable0.0%0 of 7,38007,380
2026-07-152026-07-09 → 2026-07-15Comparable0.0%0 of 7,77507,775
2026-07-162026-07-10 → 2026-07-16Comparable0.0%0 of 7,72307,723
2026-07-172026-07-11 → 2026-07-17Comparable0.0%0 of 7,40607,406
2026-07-182026-07-12 → 2026-07-18Comparable0.0%0 of 7,31507,315
2026-07-192026-07-13 → 2026-07-19Comparable0.0%1 of 7,51117,511
2026-07-202026-07-14 → 2026-07-20Comparable0.0%1 of 7,43817,438
2026-07-212026-07-15 → 2026-07-21Comparable0.0%1 of 5,62315,623
2026-07-222026-07-16 → 2026-07-22Comparable0.0%1 of 4,58414,584
2026-07-232026-07-17 → 2026-07-23Comparable0.0%1 of 3,24613,246
2026-07-242026-07-18 → 2026-07-24Comparable0.0%1 of 2,25212,252
2026-07-252026-07-19 → 2026-07-25Comparable0.1%1 of 1,82411,824
2026-07-262026-07-20 → 2026-07-26Comparable0.0%0 of 1,24001,240
2026-07-272026-07-21 → 2026-07-27Comparable0.0%0 of 1770177
2026-07-282026-07-22 → 2026-07-28Low coverage——00
2026-07-292026-07-23 → 2026-07-29Low coverage——00
2026-07-302026-07-24 → 2026-07-30Low coverage——00
2026-07-312026-07-25 → 2026-07-31Low coverage——00
2026-08-012026-07-26 → 2026-08-01Low coverage——00
2026-08-022026-07-27 → 2026-08-02Low coverage——00
2026-08-032026-07-28 → 2026-08-03Low coverage——00
2026-08-042026-07-29 → 2026-08-04Low coverage——00
2026-08-052026-07-30 → 2026-08-05Low coverage——00
2026-08-062026-07-31 → 2026-08-06Low coverage——00
2026-08-072026-08-01 → 2026-08-07Low coverage——00
2026-08-082026-08-02 → 2026-08-08Low coverage——00
2026-08-092026-08-03 → 2026-08-09Low coverage——00
2026-08-102026-08-04 → 2026-08-10Low coverage——00
2026-08-112026-08-05 → 2026-08-11Low coverage——00
2026-08-122026-08-06 → 2026-08-12Low coverage——00
2026-08-132026-08-07 → 2026-08-13Low coverage——00
2026-08-142026-08-08 → 2026-08-14Low coverage——00
2026-08-152026-08-09 → 2026-08-15Low coverage——00
2026-08-162026-08-10 → 2026-08-16Low coverage——00
2026-08-172026-08-11 → 2026-08-17Low coverage——00
2026-08-182026-08-12 → 2026-08-18Low coverage——00
2026-08-192026-08-13 → 2026-08-19Low coverage——00
2026-08-202026-08-14 → 2026-08-20Low coverage——00
2026-08-212026-08-15 → 2026-08-21Comparable0.0%0 of 6240624
2026-08-222026-08-16 → 2026-08-22Comparable0.0%0 of 1,33301,333
2026-08-232026-08-17 → 2026-08-23Comparable0.0%0 of 2,20402,204
2026-08-242026-08-18 → 2026-08-24Comparable0.0%0 of 3,28803,288
2026-08-252026-08-19 → 2026-08-25Comparable0.0%0 of 3,94503,945
2026-08-262026-08-20 → 2026-08-26Comparable0.0%0 of 4,68104,681
2026-08-272026-08-21 → 2026-08-27Comparable0.0%0 of 5,54905,549
2026-08-282026-08-22 → 2026-08-28Comparable0.0%0 of 5,73805,738
2026-08-292026-08-23 → 2026-08-29Comparable0.0%0 of 5,70605,706
2026-08-302026-08-24 → 2026-08-30Comparable0.0%0 of 5,86005,860
2026-08-312026-08-25 → 2026-08-31Comparable0.0%0 of 5,92105,921
2026-09-012026-08-26 → 2026-09-01Comparable0.0%0 of 6,86706,867
2026-09-022026-08-27 → 2026-09-02Comparable0.0%0 of 7,90507,905
2026-09-032026-08-28 → 2026-09-03Comparable0.0%0 of 7,91007,910
2026-09-042026-08-29 → 2026-09-04Comparable0.1%4 of 8,08458,084
2026-09-052026-08-30 → 2026-09-05Comparable0.2%12 of 7,930137,930
2026-09-062026-08-31 → 2026-09-06Comparable0.2%12 of 7,369137,369
2026-09-072026-09-01 → 2026-09-07Comparable0.2%12 of 6,522136,522
2026-09-082026-09-02 → 2026-09-08Comparable0.2%12 of 6,054136,054
2026-09-092026-09-03 → 2026-09-09Comparable0.2%12 of 5,356135,356
2026-09-102026-09-04 → 2026-09-10Comparable0.2%12 of 5,410135,410
2026-09-112026-09-05 → 2026-09-11Comparable0.2%8 of 5,26885,268
2026-09-122026-09-06 → 2026-09-12Comparable0.0%0 of 5,35905,359
2026-09-132026-09-07 → 2026-09-13Comparable0.0%0 of 5,29505,295
2026-09-142026-09-08 → 2026-09-14Comparable0.0%0 of 6,32106,321
2026-09-152026-09-09 → 2026-09-15Comparable0.0%0 of 6,18306,183
2026-09-162026-09-10 → 2026-09-16Comparable0.0%0 of 5,92705,927
2026-09-172026-09-11 → 2026-09-17Comparable0.0%0 of 5,71705,717
2026-09-182026-09-12 → 2026-09-18Comparable0.1%4 of 5,87845,878
2026-09-192026-09-13 → 2026-09-19Comparable0.2%9 of 6,138126,138
2026-09-202026-09-14 → 2026-09-20Comparable0.2%12 of 6,444166,444
2026-09-212026-09-15 → 2026-09-21Comparable0.2%13 of 5,961175,961
2026-09-222026-09-16 → 2026-09-22Comparable0.2%13 of 6,818176,818
2026-09-232026-09-17 → 2026-09-23Comparable0.2%13 of 7,085177,085
2026-09-242026-09-18 → 2026-09-24Comparable0.2%13 of 7,529177,529
2026-09-252026-09-19 → 2026-09-25Comparable0.1%9 of 7,855137,855
2026-09-262026-09-20 → 2026-09-26Comparable0.1%4 of 7,50157,501
2026-09-272026-09-21 → 2026-09-27Comparable0.0%1 of 7,30017,300
2026-09-282026-09-22 → 2026-09-28Comparable0.0%0 of 7,34507,345
2026-09-292026-09-23 → 2026-09-29Comparable0.0%0 of 7,11507,115
2026-09-302026-09-24 → 2026-09-30Comparable0.0%0 of 7,36407,364
2026-10-012026-09-25 → 2026-10-01Comparable0.0%0 of 7,75707,757
2026-10-022026-09-26 → 2026-10-02Comparable0.0%1 of 7,56417,564
2026-10-032026-09-27 → 2026-10-03Comparable0.0%1 of 7,73917,739
2026-10-042026-09-28 → 2026-10-04Comparable0.0%1 of 7,87117,871
2026-10-052026-09-29 → 2026-10-05Comparable0.0%1 of 8,70118,701
2026-10-062026-09-30 → 2026-10-06Comparable0.0%1 of 7,88917,889
2026-10-072026-10-01 → 2026-10-07Comparable0.2%17 of 8,234218,234
2026-10-082026-10-02 → 2026-10-08Comparable0.2%19 of 7,775247,775
2026-10-092026-10-03 → 2026-10-09Comparable0.3%20 of 7,899267,899
2026-10-102026-10-04 → 2026-10-10Comparable0.3%20 of 7,834267,834

Each point is a seven-day rolling window of complete UTC days; a point is comparable only when at least 100 analyzed posts or comments fall inside it. A day with no analyzed records counts as zero; missing coverage is marked and never shown as zero. The series ends at the latest complete analyzed day — it never extends into the current incomplete day. How attention is measured.

Recent mentions

  1. Comment

    Yea, clearly I’m the misguided one when my opinion is coming from my own lived experience with gender affirming care. While your opinion is coming from bigotry. Literally no legitimate studies have shown gender affirming care to be harmful. The cass review is anti-science and is clearly prejudiced against trans people. Using it as a source is actually hilarious. You’re just a sad pathetic bigot.

  2. Comment

    Okay you’re just straight up dead wrong. The majority of the medical community agrees gender-affirming care is not detrimental to children. The best treatment for gender dysphoria is transitioning, and that’s an indisputable fact (speaking from personal experience). The UK has been famously bigoted against trans people, of course they’d ban trans healthcare… use your brain.

  3. Comment

    Even in the US Supreme court the ACLU lawyer Chase Strangio could NOT provide any evidence that gender affirming care reduced suicide in trans youth. So no study proves reduction in suicide rate among trans youth. The supreme court transcript clearly recorded what Strangio stated in the *U.S.* v\*. Skrmetti\*, case. If there was evidence that youth gender affirming care reduces suicide why didn't Strangio provide it and win the case in 2024?

  4. Comment

    If you actually read that article, you would learn that the person who ran the study actually supports gender affirming care, and was more concerned that the results would be weaponized by opponents who didn't actually understand it. So yes, politics were involved, but not in the way you're trying to claim.

  5. Comment

    I’m not debating whether cross sex hormones or puberty blockers are gender affirming care. Can you show me a well regarded medical association that classifies hair transplants as gender affirming care?

Excerpts above are public Reddit posts and comments. WIO never synthesizes Reddit URLs from stored ids, and entities are extracted automatically and may be wrong. See the extraction notes and the limitations and privacy section of the methodology.