WIO

new york

LOCATION

Evidence in r/nyc — New York

Trend support

Rising+0.5 pp
Current seven-day window
Current 2026-07-14 → 2026-07-20
Comparison seven-day window
Comparison 2026-07-07 → 2026-07-13
Distinct-document support
Seen in 88 current vs 41 comparison posts/comments
Mentions
109 current vs 49 mentions

Windows are complete UTC days compared with the preceding seven. How trends are measured.

Also Mentioned 403 times in the most-discussed range 2026-06-21 → 2026-07-21 — frequency, not a trend.

Attention over time

7-day rolling share of analyzed posts/comments mentioning this entity · 90 daily points ending 2026-07-20

Final complete day: 2026-07-20. Attention was 1.2% — this entity appeared in 88 of 7,438 analyzed posts/comments in the seven days ending that day (109 mentions).

0%1.4%Apr 22Jun 5Jul 20

Hover, touch, or focus the chart (Tab) and use the arrow keys — each point is one seven-day window.

View all 90 data points (semantic table)
Week endingSeven-day rangeStatusPrevalenceSeen inMentionsAnalyzed
2026-04-222026-04-162026-04-22Comparable1.1%86 of 7,6701147,670
2026-04-232026-04-172026-04-23Comparable1.1%80 of 7,3081027,308
2026-04-242026-04-182026-04-24Comparable1.1%78 of 7,090977,090
2026-04-252026-04-192026-04-25Comparable1.1%78 of 6,936986,936
2026-04-262026-04-202026-04-26Comparable1.2%79 of 6,742986,742
2026-04-272026-04-212026-04-27Comparable1.1%73 of 6,387916,387
2026-04-282026-04-222026-04-28Comparable1.3%92 of 7,2621197,262
2026-04-292026-04-232026-04-29Comparable1.3%97 of 7,5831317,583
2026-04-302026-04-242026-04-30Comparable1.4%101 of 7,4891407,489
2026-05-012026-04-252026-05-01Comparable1.3%88 of 6,7021296,702
2026-05-022026-04-262026-05-02Comparable1.4%90 of 6,4761326,476
2026-05-032026-04-272026-05-03Comparable1.4%89 of 6,5881306,588
2026-05-042026-04-282026-05-04Comparable1.3%95 of 7,1461347,146
2026-05-052026-04-292026-05-05Comparable1.2%79 of 6,7601126,760
2026-05-062026-04-302026-05-06Comparable1.2%85 of 6,9281136,928
2026-05-072026-05-012026-05-07Comparable1.3%87 of 6,9641166,964
2026-05-082026-05-022026-05-08Comparable1.2%85 of 6,9341066,934
2026-05-092026-05-032026-05-09Comparable1.2%87 of 7,2481077,248
2026-05-102026-05-042026-05-10Comparable1.2%96 of 7,7171197,717
2026-05-112026-05-052026-05-11Comparable1.2%88 of 7,3071077,307
2026-05-122026-05-062026-05-12Comparable1.2%97 of 8,1781188,178
2026-05-132026-05-072026-05-13Comparable1.1%91 of 8,3681118,368
2026-05-142026-05-082026-05-14Comparable1.0%85 of 8,7421038,742
2026-05-152026-05-092026-05-15Comparable1.0%88 of 9,0561099,056
2026-05-162026-05-102026-05-16Comparable1.0%96 of 9,5901209,590
2026-05-172026-05-112026-05-17Comparable0.9%85 of 9,3201069,320
2026-05-182026-05-122026-05-18Comparable0.9%92 of 10,12311610,123
2026-05-192026-05-132026-05-19Comparable0.9%82 of 9,1761049,176
2026-05-202026-05-142026-05-20Comparable0.9%76 of 8,754978,754
2026-05-212026-05-152026-05-21Comparable0.8%65 of 8,234808,234
2026-05-222026-05-162026-05-22Comparable0.9%74 of 7,974887,974
2026-05-232026-05-172026-05-23Comparable0.8%62 of 7,659727,659
2026-05-242026-05-182026-05-24Comparable0.8%61 of 7,507717,507
2026-05-252026-05-192026-05-25Comparable0.8%49 of 6,383566,383
2026-05-262026-05-202026-05-26Comparable0.8%50 of 6,418566,418
2026-05-272026-05-212026-05-27Comparable0.8%55 of 6,658636,658
2026-05-282026-05-222026-05-28Comparable0.9%63 of 6,920726,920
2026-05-292026-05-232026-05-29Comparable0.6%47 of 7,363547,363
2026-05-302026-05-242026-05-30Comparable0.7%51 of 7,078617,078
2026-05-312026-05-252026-05-31Comparable0.8%57 of 7,230687,230
2026-06-012026-05-262026-06-01Comparable0.9%70 of 7,803837,803
2026-06-022026-05-272026-06-02Comparable0.9%71 of 8,151888,151
2026-06-032026-05-282026-06-03Comparable1.0%74 of 7,518957,518
2026-06-042026-05-292026-06-04Comparable1.0%72 of 7,197977,197
2026-06-052026-05-302026-06-05Comparable1.1%76 of 7,019997,019
2026-06-062026-05-312026-06-06Comparable1.0%74 of 7,103957,103
2026-06-072026-06-012026-06-07Comparable1.1%76 of 7,071997,071
2026-06-082026-06-022026-06-08Comparable1.1%88 of 7,7051177,705
2026-06-092026-06-032026-06-09Comparable1.2%90 of 7,6361157,636
2026-06-102026-06-042026-06-10Comparable1.1%93 of 8,3231178,323
2026-06-112026-06-052026-06-11Comparable1.2%102 of 8,5231258,523
2026-06-122026-06-062026-06-12Comparable1.2%101 of 8,2571278,257
2026-06-132026-06-072026-06-13Comparable1.2%101 of 8,3441268,344
2026-06-142026-06-082026-06-14Comparable1.3%134 of 10,17316110,173
2026-06-152026-06-092026-06-15Comparable1.3%128 of 9,7191509,719
2026-06-162026-06-102026-06-16Comparable1.4%129 of 9,1601589,160
2026-06-172026-06-112026-06-17Comparable1.4%118 of 8,5341438,534
2026-06-182026-06-122026-06-18Comparable1.3%107 of 8,1751318,175
2026-06-192026-06-132026-06-19Comparable1.4%105 of 7,7721337,772
2026-06-202026-06-142026-06-20Comparable1.4%104 of 7,5621367,562
2026-06-212026-06-152026-06-21Comparable1.2%74 of 5,9991065,999
2026-06-222026-06-162026-06-22Comparable1.3%82 of 6,3041186,304
2026-06-232026-06-172026-06-23Comparable1.2%81 of 6,8331136,833
2026-06-242026-06-182026-06-24Comparable1.2%109 of 8,7941438,794
2026-06-252026-06-192026-06-25Comparable1.3%118 of 9,1401509,140
2026-06-262026-06-202026-06-26Comparable1.2%127 of 10,62915210,629
2026-06-272026-06-212026-06-27Comparable1.2%130 of 11,31915211,319
2026-06-282026-06-222026-06-28Comparable1.1%125 of 11,11714311,117
2026-06-292026-06-232026-06-29Comparable1.0%101 of 10,19411310,194
2026-06-302026-06-242026-06-30Comparable1.0%96 of 9,6051049,605
2026-07-012026-06-252026-07-01Comparable0.9%68 of 7,816747,816
2026-07-022026-06-262026-07-02Comparable1.0%71 of 7,438827,438
2026-07-032026-06-272026-07-03Comparable1.0%65 of 6,435826,435
2026-07-042026-06-282026-07-04Comparable1.1%66 of 5,782855,782
2026-07-052026-06-292026-07-05Comparable1.2%62 of 5,400805,400
2026-07-062026-06-302026-07-06Comparable1.1%63 of 5,582815,582
2026-07-072026-07-012026-07-07Comparable1.0%58 of 5,621755,621
2026-07-082026-07-022026-07-08Comparable1.1%55 of 5,257715,257
2026-07-092026-07-032026-07-09Comparable0.9%47 of 5,556625,556
2026-07-102026-07-042026-07-10Comparable0.7%43 of 5,815535,815
2026-07-112026-07-052026-07-11Comparable0.6%36 of 5,747435,747
2026-07-122026-07-062026-07-12Comparable0.6%36 of 5,803435,803
2026-07-132026-07-072026-07-13Comparable0.7%41 of 6,107496,107
2026-07-142026-07-082026-07-14Comparable1.0%75 of 7,380907,380
2026-07-152026-07-092026-07-15Comparable1.1%89 of 7,7751127,775
2026-07-162026-07-102026-07-16Comparable1.1%84 of 7,7231037,723
2026-07-172026-07-112026-07-17Comparable1.2%85 of 7,4061067,406
2026-07-182026-07-122026-07-18Comparable1.2%89 of 7,3151107,315
2026-07-192026-07-132026-07-19Comparable1.2%91 of 7,5111147,511
2026-07-202026-07-142026-07-20Comparable1.2%88 of 7,4381097,438

Each point is a seven-day rolling window of complete UTC days; a point is comparable only when at least 100 analyzed posts or comments fall inside it. A day with no analyzed records counts as zero; missing coverage is marked and never shown as zero. The series ends at the latest complete analyzed day — it never extends into the current incomplete day. How attention is measured.

Recent mentions

  1. Post

    Judge: Trump admin can't cut millions in Grants to New York -

  2. Comment

    Actual article text: Key Takeaways Initial data shows that Waymo vehicles are involved in fewer injury-causing crashes overall, but have a significantly higher rate of crashes with a serious injury or fatality than the existing New York City for-hire fleet. Waymo compares their safety data to the average human driver, but New York City for hire vehicles are in serious or fatal crashes at a rate 14-times less than the average New York City vehicle. Comparing robotaxis to the for-hire fleet they would most likely replace is a better comparison. Waymo's fleet has not yet driven enough miles to support that they are safer than for hire vehicle drivers. These initial severe crash metrics warrant significant caution and further scrutiny. This is especially relevant as robotaxi companies continue to push forward for full authorization in cities and states across the country, including New York.

  3. Comment

    But Mississippi did not slash their education funding by 50% to improve educational outcomes, did they? Because that would be straight nonsense and we both understand that would not be the logical conclusion of that policy. In fact, Mississippi’s improved outcomes followed additional funding. You want to punish New York for poor educational outcomes by slashing funding while simultaneously citing Mississippi as an example why, even though that’s absolutely not what happened there.

  4. Comment

    Mississippi does a better job teaching their black kids to read and write than california's black kids and they spend very little. *A Black Mississippi child is two and a half times as likely to be proficient in reading by fourth grade as a Black California child.* *What’s particularly impressive is that the Southern surge states lifted student achievement with only modest budgets. Spending per pupil in Alabama and Mississippi was below $12,000 in 2024, while in New York it was almost $30,000.* Blue states are failing their kids in education because they think its about money. Leftwing governance has been an absolute disaster. Bring back centrist democrats.

  5. Post

    Explosion outside New York federal building in Manhattan apparently caused by fireworks, sources say -

Excerpts above are public Reddit posts and comments. WIO never synthesizes Reddit URLs from stored ids, and entities are extracted automatically and may be wrong. See the extraction notes and the limitations and privacy section of the methodology.