WIO

cb

POSITION

Evidence in r/premierleague — Premier League

Trend support

Rising+0.2 pp
Current seven-day window
Current 2026-08-04 → 2026-08-10
Comparison seven-day window
Comparison 2026-07-28 → 2026-08-03
Distinct-document support
Seen in 90 current vs 70 comparison posts/comments
Mentions
105 current vs 86 mentions

Windows are complete UTC days compared with the preceding seven. How trends are measured.

Also Mentioned 296 times in the most-discussed range 2026-07-12 → 2026-08-11 — frequency, not a trend.

Attention over time

7-day rolling share of analyzed posts/comments mentioning this entity · 90 daily points ending 2026-08-10

Final complete day: 2026-08-10. Attention was 0.8% — this entity appeared in 90 of 11,860 analyzed posts/comments in the seven days ending that day (105 mentions).

0%1.0%May 13Jun 26Aug 10

Hover, touch, or focus the chart (Tab) and use the arrow keys — each point is one seven-day window.

View all 90 data points (semantic table)
Week endingSeven-day rangeStatusPrevalenceSeen inMentionsAnalyzed
2026-05-132026-05-072026-05-13Comparable0.1%9 of 10,9851210,985
2026-05-142026-05-082026-05-14Comparable0.1%9 of 10,9791210,979
2026-05-152026-05-092026-05-15Comparable0.2%17 of 10,9672410,967
2026-05-162026-05-102026-05-16Comparable0.2%24 of 12,7863112,786
2026-05-172026-05-112026-05-17Comparable0.2%32 of 13,9603913,960
2026-05-182026-05-122026-05-18Comparable0.2%31 of 13,8473613,847
2026-05-192026-05-132026-05-19Comparable0.2%34 of 15,9693815,969
2026-05-202026-05-142026-05-20Comparable0.2%36 of 16,2634016,263
2026-05-212026-05-152026-05-21Comparable0.2%41 of 17,4974517,497
2026-05-222026-05-162026-05-22Comparable0.3%48 of 18,6624918,662
2026-05-232026-05-172026-05-23Comparable0.3%43 of 16,9714416,971
2026-05-242026-05-182026-05-24Comparable0.2%37 of 17,9273817,927
2026-05-252026-05-192026-05-25Comparable0.3%49 of 17,3275117,327
2026-05-262026-05-202026-05-26Comparable0.3%56 of 16,2865816,286
2026-05-272026-05-212026-05-27Comparable0.3%55 of 16,2675716,267
2026-05-282026-05-222026-05-28Comparable0.3%51 of 15,2945315,294
2026-05-292026-05-232026-05-29Comparable0.3%38 of 14,8733914,873
2026-05-302026-05-242026-05-30Comparable0.2%38 of 15,7363915,736
2026-05-312026-05-252026-05-31Comparable0.3%47 of 16,2234916,223
2026-06-012026-05-262026-06-01Comparable0.3%47 of 15,8575215,857
2026-06-022026-05-272026-06-02Comparable0.3%44 of 15,6375015,637
2026-06-032026-05-282026-06-03Comparable0.3%48 of 14,5995514,599
2026-06-042026-05-292026-06-04Comparable0.4%54 of 15,0646215,064
2026-06-052026-05-302026-06-05Comparable0.4%59 of 14,2506714,250
2026-06-062026-05-312026-06-06Comparable0.5%58 of 12,9466612,946
2026-06-072026-06-012026-06-07Comparable0.5%47 of 10,1395410,139
2026-06-082026-06-022026-06-08Comparable0.4%32 of 8,510358,510
2026-06-092026-06-032026-06-09Comparable0.3%23 of 7,120257,120
2026-06-102026-06-042026-06-10Comparable0.2%19 of 7,829207,829
2026-06-112026-06-052026-06-11Comparable0.2%13 of 6,803136,803
2026-06-122026-06-062026-06-12Comparable0.2%13 of 6,309136,309
2026-06-132026-06-072026-06-13Comparable0.3%17 of 5,734175,734
2026-06-142026-06-082026-06-14Comparable0.4%20 of 5,677215,677
2026-06-152026-06-092026-06-15Comparable0.4%20 of 5,677215,677
2026-06-162026-06-102026-06-16Comparable0.5%29 of 5,939325,939
2026-06-172026-06-112026-06-17Comparable0.6%28 of 4,706314,706
2026-06-182026-06-122026-06-18Comparable0.6%27 of 4,852304,852
2026-06-192026-06-132026-06-19Comparable0.4%19 of 4,423224,423
2026-06-202026-06-142026-06-20Comparable0.4%18 of 4,492214,492
2026-06-212026-06-152026-06-21Comparable0.4%18 of 4,586204,586
2026-06-222026-06-162026-06-22Comparable0.4%19 of 4,664214,664
2026-06-232026-06-172026-06-23Comparable0.2%9 of 3,96093,960
2026-06-242026-06-182026-06-24Comparable0.2%8 of 4,15184,151
2026-06-252026-06-192026-06-25Comparable0.2%8 of 3,88983,889
2026-06-262026-06-202026-06-26Comparable0.2%12 of 4,925124,925
2026-06-272026-06-212026-06-27Comparable0.2%8 of 5,05785,057
2026-06-282026-06-222026-06-28Comparable0.1%5 of 4,72254,722
2026-06-292026-06-232026-06-29Comparable0.1%7 of 5,09375,093
2026-06-302026-06-242026-06-30Comparable0.2%8 of 5,37185,371
2026-07-012026-06-252026-07-01Comparable0.4%26 of 6,039296,039
2026-07-022026-06-262026-07-02Comparable0.5%33 of 6,440366,440
2026-07-032026-06-272026-07-03Comparable0.6%31 of 5,554345,554
2026-07-042026-06-282026-07-04Comparable0.7%34 of 5,183375,183
2026-07-052026-06-292026-07-05Comparable0.7%34 of 5,014375,014
2026-07-062026-06-302026-07-06Comparable0.7%31 of 4,690344,690
2026-07-072026-07-012026-07-07Comparable0.7%30 of 4,305334,305
2026-07-082026-07-022026-07-08Comparable0.3%12 of 3,548123,548
2026-07-092026-07-032026-07-09Comparable0.2%5 of 3,07653,076
2026-07-102026-07-042026-07-10Comparable0.1%3 of 2,95732,957
2026-07-112026-07-052026-07-11Comparable0.0%0 of 3,37903,379
2026-07-122026-07-062026-07-12Comparable0.0%0 of 3,53003,530
2026-07-132026-07-072026-07-13Comparable0.1%4 of 3,91543,915
2026-07-142026-07-082026-07-14Comparable0.2%11 of 4,696134,696
2026-07-152026-07-092026-07-15Comparable0.3%13 of 5,138155,138
2026-07-162026-07-102026-07-16Comparable0.4%24 of 5,772275,772
2026-07-172026-07-112026-07-17Comparable0.5%30 of 6,393346,393
2026-07-182026-07-122026-07-18Comparable0.5%35 of 7,032397,032
2026-07-192026-07-132026-07-19Comparable0.5%35 of 6,603396,603
2026-07-202026-07-142026-07-20Comparable0.5%31 of 6,414356,414
2026-07-212026-07-152026-07-21Comparable0.5%32 of 6,945346,945
2026-07-222026-07-162026-07-22Comparable0.5%37 of 7,244437,244
2026-07-232026-07-172026-07-23Comparable0.4%30 of 7,663357,663
2026-07-242026-07-182026-07-24Comparable0.4%30 of 7,887357,887
2026-07-252026-07-192026-07-25Comparable0.4%36 of 8,301418,301
2026-07-262026-07-202026-07-26Comparable0.4%36 of 8,625418,625
2026-07-272026-07-212026-07-27Comparable0.5%43 of 9,427489,427
2026-07-282026-07-222026-07-28Comparable0.4%36 of 9,340419,340
2026-07-292026-07-232026-07-29Comparable0.4%37 of 9,202429,202
2026-07-302026-07-242026-07-30Comparable0.4%38 of 9,399449,399
2026-07-312026-07-252026-07-31Comparable0.4%37 of 10,4144210,414
2026-08-012026-07-262026-08-01Comparable0.3%31 of 11,0023711,002
2026-08-022026-07-272026-08-02Comparable0.3%33 of 11,3843911,384
2026-08-032026-07-282026-08-03Comparable0.6%70 of 11,5618611,561
2026-08-042026-07-292026-08-04Comparable0.7%80 of 11,8069711,806
2026-08-052026-07-302026-08-05Comparable0.7%85 of 12,77610212,776
2026-08-062026-07-312026-08-06Comparable0.7%91 of 12,74011012,740
2026-08-072026-08-012026-08-07Comparable0.8%100 of 12,31212012,312
2026-08-082026-08-022026-08-08Comparable0.9%104 of 11,03212411,032
2026-08-092026-08-032026-08-09Comparable1.0%116 of 11,32813811,328
2026-08-102026-08-042026-08-10Comparable0.8%90 of 11,86010511,860

Each point is a seven-day rolling window of complete UTC days; a point is comparable only when at least 100 analyzed posts or comments fall inside it. A day with no analyzed records counts as zero; missing coverage is marked and never shown as zero. The series ends at the latest complete analyzed day — it never extends into the current incomplete day. How attention is measured.

Recent mentions

  1. Comment

    As I said he’s just an average CB

  2. Comment

    >RDZ only fell out with Brighton. And players at Marseille! He got into physical altercations with Kone and there were multiple situations where (if I'm not mistaken) his players got into fights with each other. >We’ve just signed Micky’s pal to be his CB partner. On paper I really like the Van Hecke signing (hate when the teams I support go up against him), I just am not convinced that Spurs have a cohesive vision as to what their team is supposed to look like. They've outspent all but one club and in the past 5 years and haven't finished in the top half of the prem in two years. Many of the signings they made looked good on paper, it just hasn't really come together.

  3. Comment

    It's a win win. We now have 4 senior CBs. He can start the season alongside van dijk until Jaquet is fit or he impresses and keeps his place. He doesn't do well he goes back to Barca and we take up our option to re sign Quansah.

  4. Comment

    Why need you be so antagonistic like this? Conversation is not a cock-fight. You seem to have to label me things to make your point across, which isn’t great. Maybe you’re just focused on the negativity, and fail to see the positivity in things. Thats your own choice. It’s always a two sided coin, this positivity-negativity token. Maybe you see any criticism as destructive negativity. Again your own choice. I know that when I countered your first response to alter the balance back to friendly conversation, you doubled down on your spanking in your response. So maybe you just like smacking ppl with words. Look at my original comment and point to one thing that doesn’t align with reality. Okay, you brought up the midfield amidst your rambling. What was overrun and outrun last season? Our midfield. Macca was lost all season long. Garv a shadow of his yester-self the prior season. Problems of our own making: 1- Our fitness falling off a cliff with the change of fitness philosophy (which if you read sport science, you’d see that there is consensus on how low intensity training leads to short term gains and long term injuries). 2- Signing an injury prone Isak for an astronomical sum instead of addressing other pressing areas. 3- Not signing a CB to rotate and develop with VVD and Konate for so long, and now expecting young Leoni and Jacquet to fill a huge gap, having shipped out home-grown Quansah. 4- Signing or sticking with a touch too many light-weight players that can’t keep up with the EPL’s physicality. 5- Continuing to believe that a midfield can operate without a 6, when every other top team has one. Yes I’ll include this since you brought it up earlier. If you want to address my points, take them head on. Don’t digress into other needless stuff.

  5. Comment

    I’m not overly hopeful but realistically he’s at best 3rd choice at CB and 2nd choice at RB (3rd when Bradley comes back). Then on that basis it’s hard for him to straight up fail unless he’s injured all year.

Excerpts above are public Reddit posts and comments. WIO never synthesizes Reddit URLs from stored ids, and entities are extracted automatically and may be wrong. See the extraction notes and the limitations and privacy section of the methodology.