WIO

cl

LEAGUE

Evidence in r/premierleague — Premier League

Trend support

Rising+0.1 pp
Current seven-day window
Current 2026-09-20 → 2026-09-26
Comparison seven-day window
Comparison 2026-09-13 → 2026-09-19
Distinct-document support
Seen in 39 current vs 27 comparison posts/comments
Mentions
47 current vs 29 mentions

Windows are complete UTC days compared with the preceding seven. How trends are measured.

Attention over time

7-day rolling share of analyzed posts/comments mentioning this entity · 90 daily points ending 2026-09-26

Final complete day: 2026-09-26. Attention was 0.3% — this entity appeared in 39 of 11,602 analyzed posts/comments in the seven days ending that day (47 mentions).

0%1.0%Jun 29Aug 12Sep 26

Hover, touch, or focus the chart (Tab) and use the arrow keys — each point is one seven-day window.

View all 90 data points (semantic table)
Week endingSeven-day rangeStatusPrevalenceSeen inMentionsAnalyzed
2026-06-292026-06-23 → 2026-06-29Comparable0.1%6 of 5,09375,093
2026-06-302026-06-24 → 2026-06-30Comparable0.1%5 of 5,37155,371
2026-07-012026-06-25 → 2026-07-01Comparable0.1%6 of 6,03966,039
2026-07-022026-06-26 → 2026-07-02Comparable0.1%6 of 6,44066,440
2026-07-032026-06-27 → 2026-07-03Comparable0.1%3 of 5,55435,554
2026-07-042026-06-28 → 2026-07-04Comparable0.1%3 of 5,18335,183
2026-07-052026-06-29 → 2026-07-05Comparable0.0%2 of 5,01425,014
2026-07-062026-06-30 → 2026-07-06Comparable0.0%1 of 4,69014,690
2026-07-072026-07-01 → 2026-07-07Comparable0.1%2 of 4,30524,305
2026-07-082026-07-02 → 2026-07-08Comparable0.0%1 of 3,54813,548
2026-07-092026-07-03 → 2026-07-09Comparable0.0%1 of 3,07613,076
2026-07-102026-07-04 → 2026-07-10Comparable0.1%2 of 2,95722,957
2026-07-112026-07-05 → 2026-07-11Comparable0.1%3 of 3,37933,379
2026-07-122026-07-06 → 2026-07-12Comparable0.1%3 of 3,53033,530
2026-07-132026-07-07 → 2026-07-13Comparable0.1%3 of 3,91533,915
2026-07-142026-07-08 → 2026-07-14Comparable0.1%3 of 4,69634,696
2026-07-152026-07-09 → 2026-07-15Comparable0.1%3 of 5,13835,138
2026-07-162026-07-10 → 2026-07-16Comparable0.1%3 of 5,77235,772
2026-07-172026-07-11 → 2026-07-17Comparable0.0%2 of 6,39326,393
2026-07-182026-07-12 → 2026-07-18Comparable0.0%1 of 7,03217,032
2026-07-192026-07-13 → 2026-07-19Comparable0.0%1 of 6,60316,603
2026-07-202026-07-14 → 2026-07-20Comparable0.0%1 of 6,41416,414
2026-07-212026-07-15 → 2026-07-21Comparable0.0%3 of 6,94536,945
2026-07-222026-07-16 → 2026-07-22Comparable0.1%9 of 7,24497,244
2026-07-232026-07-17 → 2026-07-23Comparable0.5%40 of 7,663477,663
2026-07-242026-07-18 → 2026-07-24Comparable0.5%42 of 7,887497,887
2026-07-252026-07-19 → 2026-07-25Comparable0.6%51 of 8,301598,301
2026-07-262026-07-20 → 2026-07-26Comparable0.7%57 of 8,625668,625
2026-07-272026-07-21 → 2026-07-27Comparable0.8%77 of 9,427899,427
2026-07-282026-07-22 → 2026-07-28Comparable0.9%85 of 9,340999,340
2026-07-292026-07-23 → 2026-07-29Comparable0.9%86 of 9,2021009,202
2026-07-302026-07-24 → 2026-07-30Comparable0.7%63 of 9,399709,399
2026-07-312026-07-25 → 2026-07-31Comparable0.7%69 of 10,4147810,414
2026-08-012026-07-26 → 2026-08-01Comparable0.6%69 of 11,0027711,002
2026-08-022026-07-27 → 2026-08-02Comparable0.6%64 of 11,3847111,384
2026-08-032026-07-28 → 2026-08-03Comparable0.5%57 of 11,5616111,561
2026-08-042026-07-29 → 2026-08-04Comparable0.5%55 of 11,8065811,806
2026-08-052026-07-30 → 2026-08-05Comparable0.6%71 of 12,7767512,776
2026-08-062026-07-31 → 2026-08-06Comparable0.5%69 of 12,7407312,740
2026-08-072026-08-01 → 2026-08-07Comparable0.5%66 of 12,3126812,312
2026-08-082026-08-02 → 2026-08-08Comparable0.6%62 of 11,0326411,032
2026-08-092026-08-03 → 2026-08-09Comparable0.6%67 of 11,3286911,328
2026-08-102026-08-04 → 2026-08-10Comparable0.6%76 of 11,8608111,860
2026-08-112026-08-05 → 2026-08-11Comparable0.6%68 of 10,6247210,624
2026-08-122026-08-06 → 2026-08-12Comparable0.5%45 of 8,422488,422
2026-08-132026-08-07 → 2026-08-13Comparable0.6%39 of 6,730426,730
2026-08-142026-08-08 → 2026-08-14Comparable0.7%34 of 4,937374,937
2026-08-152026-08-09 → 2026-08-15Comparable0.7%29 of 3,954323,954
2026-08-162026-08-10 → 2026-08-16Comparable0.9%23 of 2,718262,718
2026-08-172026-08-11 → 2026-08-17Comparable0.2%1 of 4471447
2026-08-182026-08-12 → 2026-08-18Low coverage——00
2026-08-192026-08-13 → 2026-08-19Low coverage——00
2026-08-202026-08-14 → 2026-08-20Low coverage——00
2026-08-212026-08-15 → 2026-08-21Low coverage——00
2026-08-222026-08-16 → 2026-08-22Low coverage——00
2026-08-232026-08-17 → 2026-08-23Low coverage——00
2026-08-242026-08-18 → 2026-08-24Low coverage——00
2026-08-252026-08-19 → 2026-08-25Low coverage——00
2026-08-262026-08-20 → 2026-08-26Low coverage——00
2026-08-272026-08-21 → 2026-08-27Low coverage——00
2026-08-282026-08-22 → 2026-08-28Comparable0.5%4 of 8244824
2026-08-292026-08-23 → 2026-08-29Comparable0.4%11 of 2,904112,904
2026-08-302026-08-24 → 2026-08-30Comparable0.6%29 of 5,205315,205
2026-08-312026-08-25 → 2026-08-31Comparable0.5%35 of 7,202397,202
2026-09-012026-08-26 → 2026-09-01Comparable0.4%37 of 9,190419,190
2026-09-022026-08-27 → 2026-09-02Comparable0.4%47 of 11,1375111,137
2026-09-032026-08-28 → 2026-09-03Comparable0.4%50 of 12,7775612,777
2026-09-042026-08-29 → 2026-09-04Comparable0.5%63 of 13,5187013,518
2026-09-052026-08-30 → 2026-09-05Comparable0.5%62 of 13,8016913,801
2026-09-062026-08-31 → 2026-09-06Comparable0.3%51 of 14,8405614,840
2026-09-072026-09-01 → 2026-09-07Comparable0.4%50 of 14,1775314,177
2026-09-082026-09-02 → 2026-09-08Comparable0.4%54 of 12,8365712,836
2026-09-092026-09-03 → 2026-09-09Comparable0.4%47 of 12,0085012,008
2026-09-102026-09-04 → 2026-09-10Comparable0.4%45 of 11,3194611,319
2026-09-112026-09-05 → 2026-09-11Comparable0.3%33 of 10,8383310,838
2026-09-122026-09-06 → 2026-09-12Comparable0.3%31 of 10,2423110,242
2026-09-132026-09-07 → 2026-09-13Comparable0.3%32 of 9,420339,420
2026-09-142026-09-08 → 2026-09-14Comparable0.3%35 of 10,9113610,911
2026-09-152026-09-09 → 2026-09-15Comparable0.3%33 of 12,5243412,524
2026-09-162026-09-10 → 2026-09-16Comparable0.3%31 of 12,4063212,406
2026-09-172026-09-11 → 2026-09-17Comparable0.3%31 of 12,0223212,022
2026-09-182026-09-12 → 2026-09-18Comparable0.2%27 of 11,7712911,771
2026-09-192026-09-13 → 2026-09-19Comparable0.2%27 of 13,3532913,353
2026-09-202026-09-14 → 2026-09-20Comparable0.2%26 of 12,4802712,480
2026-09-212026-09-15 → 2026-09-21Comparable0.2%20 of 11,6332211,633
2026-09-222026-09-16 → 2026-09-22Comparable0.3%29 of 11,8003111,800
2026-09-232026-09-17 → 2026-09-23Comparable0.3%31 of 12,2423312,242
2026-09-242026-09-18 → 2026-09-24Comparable0.3%32 of 12,4043412,404
2026-09-252026-09-19 → 2026-09-25Comparable0.3%34 of 12,8003712,800
2026-09-262026-09-20 → 2026-09-26Comparable0.3%39 of 11,6024711,602

Each point is a seven-day rolling window of complete UTC days; a point is comparable only when at least 100 analyzed posts or comments fall inside it. A day with no analyzed records counts as zero; missing coverage is marked and never shown as zero. The series ends at the latest complete analyzed day — it never extends into the current incomplete day. How attention is measured.

Recent mentions

  1. Comment

    Relatively simple. If their results against City changed their league position then they can show material loss. And it wouldn't be compensation is would be damages claimed in court. City has been found guilty of 114 counts of cheating. Whatever penalty the PL apply, it will be dwarfed by the damaged claimed in court by every team they've played against since this started (much like Burnley vs Everton- thats a £35m claim from one club and £19m of financial irregularity by Everton). Its a pretty open and shut case against Citeh now the guilty verdicts have dropped. PL teams get, roughly, £1m per table position, so to show loss, you just have to show the team that cheated changed your league position. Not going to be hard. Then the CL income missed, cup income, knock on sales, relegation, etc. Nothing heroetic about the gymnastics. There is solid legal precedent, ample evidence of cheating and the financials are big numbers in each and every case. One team getting a cash boost from this means no other team can stand back and just accept the PL punishment as the end of it. It will be like vultures on a carcass. City's liabilities make them an absolutely toxic purchase, they are unsellable. Administration and bankruptcy would be the only way to close off those liabilities. Hence the prediction that only a phoenix club comes out of this.

  2. Comment

    Of course, leaving Maine Road was one thing I wish never happened. That atmosphere and community was unreal. Never had anything like it at the Etihad, you only get it at away games. If I had it my way we’d still be at Maine Road. But man I would never have ever, ever imagined we’d have been competing for the CL let alone winning it. Unreal, and honestly not sure I could say if it’s worth it or not. I miss being a proper football club, grassroots, United were the ‘corporation’ we were the club for the locals. Proper fuck the big clubs type. Ironic how it turned out lol. But not worth it? Not sure. Apart from the reputation we lost, if we go back to how it was, then we’ll just be in the same position we would’ve been in without the takeover. City’s built up the local area quite a bit around the Etihad too so swings and roundabouts

  3. Comment

    Sorry, either you misunderstood me or I wasn't clear enough. City was overinflating it's revenue, in order to be able to spend more of its own money. They weren't really greatly outspending the league, their spending was roughly on par with United and Chelsea. And they haven't like stolen money from anyone or anything. They got around the system that was stoping them from spending their own money and being competitive with top club. Just like Newcastle isn't allowed to be competitive despite obviously having money. A lots of people want to pretend that it's the worse offense in sporting history, I don't. Sure punish them for breaking the rules, but also maybe get rid of the rules that are forcing Villa to sell their best players for FFP purposes even when they qualify for CL. While genuinely bottom-5 Spurs are splurging 500m like it's nothing. So there you go, I simply hate FFP closing the shop with a burning passion.

  4. Comment

    Not true, similarly to city they ended up with players they shouldn't have had. They gave out underhanded payments to agents and family members of players to get them to sign, hazard and ramires were 2 of those players, hazard is arguably their best ever player, he was POTS for them in 2 premier league winning seasons and ramires was vital in 2012 to help them win the CL, they are just as bent as city and both are cancers to the league and sport, thankfully both of them being found guilty means their success is ultimately meaningless.

  5. Comment

    I’ve read elsewhere that the PL clubs aren’t looking for retrospective action but for future sanctions. I strongly disagree. At the very least they need to be stripped of multiple titles. Any future sanctions needs to be long lasting. Not just one or two seasons. I’d go for a 10-15 point reduction for each of the next 6/7 years. That means it will be hard to reach CL places and almost impossible to win titles.

Excerpts above are public Reddit posts and comments. WIO never synthesizes Reddit URLs from stored ids, and entities are extracted automatically and may be wrong. See the extraction notes and the limitations and privacy section of the methodology.