le fee

Attention over time

7-day rolling share of analyzed posts/comments mentioning this entity · 90 daily points ending 2026-09-26

Final complete day: 2026-09-26. Attention was 0.4% — this entity appeared in 44 of 11,602 analyzed posts/comments in the seven days ending that day (54 mentions).

Each point is a seven-day rolling window of complete UTC days; a point is comparable only when at least 100 analyzed posts or comments fall inside it. A day with no analyzed records counts as zero; missing coverage is marked and never shown as zero. The series ends at the latest complete analyzed day — it never extends into the current incomplete day. How attention is measured.

Recent mentions

1. 2026-09-23 13:05 UTCComment

   You’re not wrong. Le Fee’s hand controlled the ball first.

2. 2026-09-22 15:58 UTCComment

   What is reasonable is that IF Le Fee doesn't handball it then Anderson doesn't either.

3. 2026-09-22 14:46 UTCComment

   But clearly not all handballs are equal. Le Fee's was incidental, but it's reasonable to not extend that benefit of a doubt to Anderson after swatting the ball in a much more advantageous and unnatural manner. They're not even close to being the same.

4. 2026-09-22 14:17 UTCComment

   honestly if Anderson deliberately bats it away, I don't understand why the earlier accidental touch from Le Fee makes that disappear every week there is another handball where the explanation only makes sense after someone writes 5 paragraphs. at some point the rule is the problem

5. 2026-09-22 13:53 UTCComment

   Yes but if it doesn't hit Le Fee's hand first the ball probably doesn't hit Anderson's hand either. You either give both the beneft of the doubt or neither.