premier league

Attention over time

7-day rolling share of analyzed posts/comments mentioning this entity · 90 daily points ending 2026-09-26

Final complete day: 2026-09-26. Attention was 2.2% — this entity appeared in 249 of 11,602 analyzed posts/comments in the seven days ending that day (288 mentions).

Each point is a seven-day rolling window of complete UTC days; a point is comparable only when at least 100 analyzed posts or comments fall inside it. A day with no analyzed records counts as zero; missing coverage is marked and never shown as zero. The series ends at the latest complete analyzed day — it never extends into the current incomplete day. How attention is measured.

Recent mentions

1. 2026-09-26 23:35 UTCComment

   This is one of the reasons I’ve never cared much about city’s charges. Let clubs invest and none of this would be a problem. The most angry clubs about their charges have always been the OG robber barons of the premier league, Arsenal, United, Liverpool. They hate us and City because we threatened their position in football and created FFP to make sure no one else ever could. Financial fair play should mean everyone can stay the same. They named it that but made the league less fair than ever.

2. 2026-09-26 23:31 UTCComment

   The problem is that as soon as a smaller team gets a good squad, the old elite clubs would simply tear that team apart. Yeah they get a good amount of money for said players, but what would be the point if they aren't able to build on their already good squad. Can't win the league if they always have to rebuild their squad and hope they don't come knocking again That's why Leicester City wining the premier league was simply marvelous. Although they did illegally, City was able ao attract talents that could've easily gone to the old elite clubs.

3. 2026-09-26 23:30 UTCComment

   No, but that just means you have a lot of company in being very wrong and not understanding how the premier league works

4. 2026-09-26 23:24 UTCComment

   Alright bro, you’re reaching. There is no championship side that would finish in the top half of La Liga. Well besides West Ham but in reality there should be in the Premier League. For one thing, they would also have to deal with the strict FFP that other teams have to deal with. Which means they wouldn’t be able to spend as much and would be in a similar position to say, Racing Santander. I do agree that the TV distribution money should be fixed. There no serious league where the bottom team gets, 40 million euros and the top team gets 160 or something like that. Right now, the two juggernauts of Real Madrid and Barcelona, are taking way too much money out. And I say that as a Barcelona fan. I don’t agree with that approach.

5. 2026-09-26 22:40 UTCComment

   How else would you impose financially responsible and sustainable rules? Also the rules were put into action by the Premier league association which is made up of the twenty participating football clubs. Which is made up of many small clubs. You have to consider that the small clubs were creating this to prevent themselves from being ended by clubs for instance unfairly caused them to be relegated