icp

Attention over time

7-day rolling share of analyzed posts/comments mentioning this entity · 90 daily points ending 2026-08-06

Final complete day: 2026-08-06. Attention was 0.6% — this entity appeared in 11 of 1,744 analyzed posts/comments in the seven days ending that day (15 mentions).

Each point is a seven-day rolling window of complete UTC days; a point is comparable only when at least 100 analyzed posts or comments fall inside it. A day with no analyzed records counts as zero; missing coverage is marked and never shown as zero. The series ends at the latest complete analyzed day — it never extends into the current incomplete day. How attention is measured.

Recent mentions

1. 2026-08-05 11:56 UTCComment

   Yeah this is interesting it’s exactly where we’re at right now. We’re also building into a space where the problem exists subconsciously but isn’t largely being answered yet. Reason being our ICP range is so broad. It’s not a specific problem solved for a specific person. It benefits many I’d say what we’re doing now is build enough to get early interest where people get what you’re doing. We fall into the “let’s just add this then it’s ready” but it’s becoming a procrastination vs a tangible benefit which is to “get people using it / trying it” what’s missing you can always show in prototype / wireframe form too I guess from what you’re saying you’re a builder, not a salesman or someone versed in GTM so even knowing what’s effective is a new challenge. The traditional routes are bloated too like outreach on LinkedIn is something like 2-3% return rate… emails go to spam, automation gets detected and blocked I’d say find places where people in your ICP space hang out like meet ups and get chatting to real people, exchange details and offer demos?

2. 2026-08-05 10:17 UTCComment

   if the icp is a performance marketer testing creatives fast, the number on that page should be turnaround, not price. twenty variants by tomorrow morning is the actual offer and everything else is detail. id also pin down revisions before you take a single order at that price. thats the bit that turns these into a service you end up resenting.

3. 2026-08-05 04:02 UTCComment

   ICP is someone who started with Performance Marketing and wants multiple video creatives to test fast

4. 2026-08-04 08:02 UTCComment

   Yep. The annoying bit is that "beta users" only count if they're close enough to the real ICP and grumpy enough to tell you what's broken. Otherwise you just get polite validation theatre with a nicer spreadsheet.

5. 2026-08-03 14:07 UTCComment

   Sometimes people struggle with posting consistently because they don’t see results. If that’s your issue, you need to know that results take time. And if building a habit is the problem. You can always build a system that helps. \- Like post at 11am everyday. Have a doc of inspo posts that you can take inspiration from. \- Engage for 1 hour before posting. Build a list of people to engage with. \- Send 10 connection requests to ICP everyday. Have a list of ICP you want to connect with. This reduces friction and ensures you don’t break the cycle. Ofc if you need more help, I’d love to share more tips.