WIO

owner

PERSON

Evidence in r/startups — Startups

Trend support

Rising+1.0 pp
Current seven-day window
Current 2026-10-08 → 2026-10-14
Comparison seven-day window
Comparison 2026-10-01 → 2026-10-07
Distinct-document support
Seen in 11 current vs 2 comparison posts/comments
Mentions
14 current vs 3 mentions

Windows are complete UTC days compared with the preceding seven. How trends are measured.

Also Mentioned 36 times in the most-discussed range 2026-09-15 → 2026-10-15 — frequency, not a trend.

Attention over time

7-day rolling share of analyzed posts/comments mentioning this entity · 90 daily points ending 2026-10-14

Final complete day: 2026-10-14. Attention was 1.3% — this entity appeared in 11 of 883 analyzed posts/comments in the seven days ending that day (14 mentions).

0%1.5%Jul 17Aug 30Oct 14

Hover, touch, or focus the chart (Tab) and use the arrow keys — each point is one seven-day window.

View all 90 data points (semantic table)
Week endingSeven-day rangeStatusPrevalenceSeen inMentionsAnalyzed
2026-07-172026-07-11 → 2026-07-17Comparable0.4%5 of 1,35351,353
2026-07-182026-07-12 → 2026-07-18Comparable0.4%6 of 1,47471,474
2026-07-192026-07-13 → 2026-07-19Comparable0.3%5 of 1,49361,493
2026-07-202026-07-14 → 2026-07-20Comparable0.3%5 of 1,50261,502
2026-07-212026-07-15 → 2026-07-21Comparable0.2%4 of 1,78651,786
2026-07-222026-07-16 → 2026-07-22Comparable0.4%6 of 1,70281,702
2026-07-232026-07-17 → 2026-07-23Comparable0.4%8 of 1,811111,811
2026-07-242026-07-18 → 2026-07-24Comparable0.5%8 of 1,777121,777
2026-07-252026-07-19 → 2026-07-25Comparable0.4%7 of 1,637101,637
2026-07-262026-07-20 → 2026-07-26Comparable0.5%8 of 1,713111,713
2026-07-272026-07-21 → 2026-07-27Comparable0.5%8 of 1,690111,690
2026-07-282026-07-22 → 2026-07-28Comparable0.5%7 of 1,409101,409
2026-07-292026-07-23 → 2026-07-29Comparable0.4%6 of 1,38881,388
2026-07-302026-07-24 → 2026-07-30Comparable0.8%11 of 1,307141,307
2026-07-312026-07-25 → 2026-07-31Comparable0.7%10 of 1,404121,404
2026-08-012026-07-26 → 2026-08-01Comparable0.9%13 of 1,433161,433
2026-08-022026-07-27 → 2026-08-02Comparable0.9%12 of 1,363151,363
2026-08-032026-07-28 → 2026-08-03Comparable1.0%13 of 1,346161,346
2026-08-042026-07-29 → 2026-08-04Comparable1.0%14 of 1,464181,464
2026-08-052026-07-30 → 2026-08-05Comparable0.9%13 of 1,496171,496
2026-08-062026-07-31 → 2026-08-06Comparable0.7%12 of 1,744191,744
2026-08-072026-08-01 → 2026-08-07Comparable0.7%11 of 1,597181,597
2026-08-082026-08-02 → 2026-08-08Comparable0.6%8 of 1,443141,443
2026-08-092026-08-03 → 2026-08-09Comparable0.6%8 of 1,278141,278
2026-08-102026-08-04 → 2026-08-10Comparable0.6%7 of 1,109131,109
2026-08-112026-08-05 → 2026-08-11Comparable0.7%6 of 85111851
2026-08-122026-08-06 → 2026-08-12Comparable1.1%6 of 56111561
2026-08-132026-08-07 → 2026-08-13Low coverage——091
2026-08-142026-08-08 → 2026-08-14Low coverage——00
2026-08-152026-08-09 → 2026-08-15Low coverage——00
2026-08-162026-08-10 → 2026-08-16Low coverage——00
2026-08-172026-08-11 → 2026-08-17Low coverage——00
2026-08-182026-08-12 → 2026-08-18Low coverage——00
2026-08-192026-08-13 → 2026-08-19Low coverage——00
2026-08-202026-08-14 → 2026-08-20Low coverage——00
2026-08-212026-08-15 → 2026-08-21Low coverage——00
2026-08-222026-08-16 → 2026-08-22Low coverage——00
2026-08-232026-08-17 → 2026-08-23Low coverage——00
2026-08-242026-08-18 → 2026-08-24Low coverage——087
2026-08-252026-08-19 → 2026-08-25Comparable0.8%2 of 2563256
2026-08-262026-08-20 → 2026-08-26Comparable0.4%2 of 4783478
2026-08-272026-08-21 → 2026-08-27Comparable0.3%2 of 6533653
2026-08-282026-08-22 → 2026-08-28Comparable0.3%2 of 7303730
2026-08-292026-08-23 → 2026-08-29Comparable0.2%2 of 8873887
2026-08-302026-08-24 → 2026-08-30Comparable0.3%3 of 1,04441,044
2026-08-312026-08-25 → 2026-08-31Comparable0.3%3 of 1,08341,083
2026-09-012026-08-26 → 2026-09-01Comparable0.2%2 of 1,04521,045
2026-09-022026-08-27 → 2026-09-02Comparable0.2%2 of 8902890
2026-09-032026-08-28 → 2026-09-03Comparable0.6%5 of 8505850
2026-09-042026-08-29 → 2026-09-04Comparable0.6%5 of 8935893
2026-09-052026-08-30 → 2026-09-05Comparable0.6%5 of 8495849
2026-09-062026-08-31 → 2026-09-06Comparable0.6%5 of 8195819
2026-09-072026-09-01 → 2026-09-07Comparable0.6%6 of 9366936
2026-09-082026-09-02 → 2026-09-08Comparable0.6%6 of 9937993
2026-09-092026-09-03 → 2026-09-09Comparable0.7%7 of 1,05481,054
2026-09-102026-09-04 → 2026-09-10Comparable0.4%4 of 1,03451,034
2026-09-112026-09-05 → 2026-09-11Comparable0.4%4 of 9835983
2026-09-122026-09-06 → 2026-09-12Comparable0.6%6 of 1,03071,030
2026-09-132026-09-07 → 2026-09-13Comparable0.6%6 of 1,03471,034
2026-09-142026-09-08 → 2026-09-14Comparable0.6%6 of 9487948
2026-09-152026-09-09 → 2026-09-15Comparable0.6%5 of 9075907
2026-09-162026-09-10 → 2026-09-16Comparable0.4%4 of 9064906
2026-09-172026-09-11 → 2026-09-17Comparable0.5%5 of 1,00151,001
2026-09-182026-09-12 → 2026-09-18Comparable0.5%5 of 1,07751,077
2026-09-192026-09-13 → 2026-09-19Comparable0.4%4 of 1,01741,017
2026-09-202026-09-14 → 2026-09-20Comparable0.5%5 of 1,02161,021
2026-09-212026-09-15 → 2026-09-21Comparable0.4%4 of 9955995
2026-09-222026-09-16 → 2026-09-22Comparable0.5%5 of 9908990
2026-09-232026-09-17 → 2026-09-23Comparable1.1%11 of 97415974
2026-09-242026-09-18 → 2026-09-24Comparable1.3%12 of 90216902
2026-09-252026-09-19 → 2026-09-25Comparable1.3%12 of 92216922
2026-09-262026-09-20 → 2026-09-26Comparable1.2%11 of 88715887
2026-09-272026-09-21 → 2026-09-27Comparable1.2%10 of 81213812
2026-09-282026-09-22 → 2026-09-28Comparable1.5%11 of 74414744
2026-09-292026-09-23 → 2026-09-29Comparable1.3%10 of 78411784
2026-09-302026-09-24 → 2026-09-30Comparable0.5%4 of 8144814
2026-10-012026-09-25 → 2026-10-01Comparable0.2%2 of 8682868
2026-10-022026-09-26 → 2026-10-02Comparable0.4%3 of 8443844
2026-10-032026-09-27 → 2026-10-03Comparable0.4%3 of 8423842
2026-10-042026-09-28 → 2026-10-04Comparable0.2%2 of 8512851
2026-10-052026-09-29 → 2026-10-05Comparable0.2%2 of 8703870
2026-10-062026-09-30 → 2026-10-06Comparable0.3%2 of 7713771
2026-10-072026-10-01 → 2026-10-07Comparable0.3%2 of 6833683
2026-10-082026-10-02 → 2026-10-08Comparable0.4%2 of 5733573
2026-10-092026-10-03 → 2026-10-09Comparable0.6%3 of 4925492
2026-10-102026-10-04 → 2026-10-10Comparable0.9%5 of 5487548
2026-10-112026-10-05 → 2026-10-11Comparable1.4%9 of 62612626
2026-10-122026-10-06 → 2026-10-12Comparable1.3%9 of 70611706
2026-10-132026-10-07 → 2026-10-13Comparable1.3%10 of 77012770
2026-10-142026-10-08 → 2026-10-14Comparable1.3%11 of 88314883

Each point is a seven-day rolling window of complete UTC days; a point is comparable only when at least 100 analyzed posts or comments fall inside it. A day with no analyzed records counts as zero; missing coverage is marked and never shown as zero. The series ends at the latest complete analyzed day — it never extends into the current incomplete day. How attention is measured.

Recent mentions

  1. Comment

    small consulting shops are brutal because the owner is usually the only decision maker and they're buried in client work, not checking linkedin. what's worked for people i know is going narrower than you'd think, like targeting by niche (tax firms, ops consultants, whatever) and finding them through industry associations or local chambers rather than cold platforms, since those lists are smaller but way more reachable. on the outbound side a lot of founders seem to be leaning on agent based tools like instantly or krabat ai to handle the research and list building part since finding the actual humans is the hard part, not writing the email. doesn't fix the reply rate problem though, consulting owners still ignore most of it regardless of how targeted it is. referrals from other small firms honestly outperform anything cold for this ICP.

  2. Comment

    I agree that a good product doesn't automatically bring customers. But I'm not sure struggling to get customers always means the market is saturated. One competitor that's easy to overlook is whatever people already use, even when it isn't very good. Say you're selling order management software to a shop that runs on spreadsheets and messages. Your software genuinely works better: automatic inventory updates, less data entry, fewer missed orders. But adopting it means moving data, training staff, and checking that the new process actually works. If something goes wrong, the owner has to deal with the customers. From the builder's side, it's a time-saving tool. From the buyer's side, it's also a change that could disrupt their business. Their spreadsheet might be frustrating, but at least they know where it usually breaks and how to fix it. A better system can still feel like the riskier choice. I think that complicates the idea that marketing matters more than quality. Marketing can make someone aware of your product and convince them it's good. But if migrating data and changing workflows are what's stopping them, more advertising might not solve that. Helping them migrate, letting them run both systems alongside each other, or giving them a way back if it doesn't work out could be more convincing than a longer feature list. Switching costs aren't new, so this alone doesn't prove customer acquisition is harder than ten years ago. But I'd want to understand what customers are rejecting before concluding there's no room left in the market. When you say getting customers is harder, are they usually choosing another competitor, or do they understand your product and still decide to keep doing things the old way? Those seem like pretty different problems to solve.

  3. Comment

    Keep at least 60 days of ad spend liquid plus 6 months of fixed infra and tooling costs.When scaling Meta or Google, the risk is account bans or merchant payout delays, not just unprofitable ads. If Stripe holds payouts for a 14-day review, you need cash to keep the campaigns live without personal strain.Take a consistent modest owner draw and leave everything else in a high-yield treasury account until CAC stabilizes over 90 days.

  4. Comment

    spam marking is mostly a cell phone thing. a shop's business line picks up unknown numbers because any of them could be a $8k install, so a 2 minute call is about the most normal thing that happens to them all day. if you still want the reddit route, r/hvac is mostly techs, and 'can i interview you' posts tend to get removed or ignored. what works better is answering questions there for a couple weeks (dispatch, missed calls, after hours stuff) so your name looks familiar, then dming the owners who complain about missed calls in their own comments. that's weeks to get maybe 5 conversations though, versus one evening of calling.

  5. Comment

    5-20 techs both commerial and residential , i had the option of pluming but chose hvac , the value is the answering agent and the dispatching i build into the calls dashboard but still i want to connect with some hvac owners to validate

Excerpts above are public Reddit posts and comments. WIO never synthesizes Reddit URLs from stored ids, and entities are extracted automatically and may be wrong. See the extraction notes and the limitations and privacy section of the methodology.