equality

Attention over time

7-day rolling share of analyzed posts/comments mentioning this entity · 90 daily points ending 2026-10-09

Final complete day: 2026-10-09. Attention was 0.1% — this entity appeared in 39 of 51,707 analyzed posts/comments in the seven days ending that day (51 mentions).

Each point is a seven-day rolling window of complete UTC days; a point is comparable only when at least 100 analyzed posts or comments fall inside it. A day with no analyzed records counts as zero; missing coverage is marked and never shown as zero. The series ends at the latest complete analyzed day — it never extends into the current incomplete day. How attention is measured.

Recent mentions

1. 2026-10-09 11:18 UTCComment

   You see the issue is that the LGBTQ community tend to make their sexuality their whole identity when rather it isn’t. I’m not saying that sexuality isn’t part of who you are, I’m saying that it’s not your only trait. Now once you think of it like that, you can disagree with a gay person and not disagree with their whole personality. Like I’ve met some gay people that are really nice but I’ve also met some that are pricks, it’s not a monolith. I’m not saying that anyone’s way of life is infererior because no one can judge people like that. If they do then they’re a bigoted self righteous piece of shit and I can’t stand them. But me disagreeing with someone’s life choices doesn’t mean that I look down on them for that, no one has the right to self-declare a moral high ground. We are all humans and objectively equal to one another, I am not better than you and you are not better than me, that’s what equality is. When you say that “not all viewpoints are equal” you’re doing exactly what you claim to be fighting against. You’re looking down and demonising an opinion that OBJECTIVELY doesn’t lead to hate. All I said was that I don’t agree with LGBTQ, that’s all. But if I said that hate towards gay people is justified, then yes you are well within your own rights to hate me for that, that’s logical. But opinion doesn’t always correlate with action, they are two separate things. You guys really need to learn that your opinion isn’t the only one and that it isn’t universally binding. YOU need to do better.

2. 2026-10-08 10:26 UTCComment

   If i am not mistaken, in many fieds related to social aid/justice, they started to use the word equality to mean equity in a way. Someone correct me if im wrong.

3. 2026-10-08 06:36 UTCComment

   1) It’s B with the options given unless you’re in real danger. Imo not hitting back is the right answer and if you don’t care about the hit it comes with the same message as option A: The showcase of way higher physical capabilities. 2) It’s B, thx to genetics A ends up as the same result, but will call the womens league “little league”. Regarding your question, it’s dependent on nuance. True equality would be choosing A both times and your posted picture shows why equity is often a better solution.

4. 2026-10-08 03:00 UTCComment

   Why does it need to be separate? I've always found this argument stupid because we can have equality and equity at the same time. Equality should mean everyone reaches the same standard of living; if that means some people need a little more (for example, those with physical or mental drawbacks), then they should be granted those benefits. In response to your post, these scenarios are reductive. For situation 1, we need much more information to decide what to do; for instance, is the person hitting you being cruel, and is the person a child or a full-blown adult? For situation 2: We have other options other than doing the same old categories; Neil Degresse tyson suggested spreading out categories depending on hormone levels, because such levels often determine the growth of muscles in a human body. Obviously, more research needs to be put into that, as it's a budding idea, but the point is there are more options than being shoved into an A/B multiple-choice answer.

5. 2026-10-07 23:19 UTCComment

   Also the topic of the longer term has to be addressed. Giving everyone access to the same education is good but helping certain individuals with something like ADHD or autism, by giving extra time during tests or making the course load easier for them defeats the purpose of both the equality/equity and the school system itself. If everyone is pushed up to get the same grades then employers will no longer be able to hire anybody without doing their own tests, and pushing people into jobs they can't handle because you gave them extra help during school that other students didn't have access to is both inequality and harms everyone involved in the situation.