testosterone

Attention over time

7-day rolling share of analyzed posts/comments mentioning this entity · 90 daily points ending 2026-08-31

Final complete day: 2026-08-31. Attention was 0.1% — this entity appeared in 12 of 13,222 analyzed posts/comments in the seven days ending that day (14 mentions).

Each point is a seven-day rolling window of complete UTC days; a point is comparable only when at least 100 analyzed posts or comments fall inside it. A day with no analyzed records counts as zero; missing coverage is marked and never shown as zero. The series ends at the latest complete analyzed day — it never extends into the current incomplete day. How attention is measured.

Recent mentions

1. 2026-08-31 21:44 UTCComment

   So, it's impossible to say for certain how such a scenario would work out, but if we make assumptions based on how our biology currently works, we can make some guesses. Women with high levels of testosterone experience additional difficulties getting pregnant, and are more likely to have a miscarriage. With this bit of information we can assume that if men were the ones who gave birth, that men with the lowest levels of testosterone would be the most likely to reproduce. This introduces a selection bias in men. Pregnency would still leave the carrier vulnerable which means males would need to be protected during pregnancy, a strong female would be more likely to successfully protect her male partner and future offspring. This introduces a selection bias for women.

2. 2026-08-31 21:30 UTCComment

   Biologically humans are split into 2 groups 1. The group that is essentially the genetic biological filter (men) 2. The group that is the biological incubator for children (women) If men are the ones that are the incubator they are likely not the biological filter and being the biological filter in humans means using a natural steroid called testosterone which increases muscularity, impulsiveness, and risk taking behavior at the expense of immunity and lifespan. If a man is to give birth biologically it would make no sense that they are the part of the species that is heavy risk taking and needs testosterone as those traits would make them a danger to themselves in pregnancy.

3. 2026-08-31 20:51 UTCComment

   lol. Nobody is “cherry picking” anything. I stated a simple biological fact. Men and women are fundamentally different, down to the molecular level. Injecting yourself with estrogen or testosterone does not change that. If you think it does, you belong in an asylum

4. 2026-08-31 20:33 UTCComment

   And yet studies show there's no significant difference between trans women and cis women after 2 years of HRT when it comes to physical capabilities. Is it so crazy to realizes that for every problem a cis woman might encounter there's also something a trans woman might encounter ? Also I never said anything about testosterone either. You're the one who completely missed the point of my original reply and then brought up cherry picked examples supporting your narrow view of the more complex and nuanced reality. Not to mention you instantly began insulting me and putting words in my mouth as soon as you met any kind of push back on your opinion.

5. 2026-08-31 20:21 UTCComment

   Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha. So, just so we’re clear, your official position is that if a woman starts injecting herself with testosterone that her hips will narrow, her intercondylar notch will widen and she will become less likely to tear her ACL? Among thousands and thousands of other biological differences? Hahahahahahahaha. You people belong in an asylum