woman

Attention over time

7-day rolling share of analyzed posts/comments mentioning this entity · 90 daily points ending 2026-08-31

Final complete day: 2026-08-31. Attention was 2.9% — this entity appeared in 378 of 13,222 analyzed posts/comments in the seven days ending that day (620 mentions).

Each point is a seven-day rolling window of complete UTC days; a point is comparable only when at least 100 analyzed posts or comments fall inside it. A day with no analyzed records counts as zero; missing coverage is marked and never shown as zero. The series ends at the latest complete analyzed day — it never extends into the current incomplete day. How attention is measured.

Recent mentions

1. 2026-08-31 23:58 UTCComment

   but those minority groups do need to be taken into account when making those laws, do they not? or am i supposed to just ignore this situation entirely even though i am literally a woman who was forced to carry a rape pregnancy to term?

2. 2026-08-31 23:57 UTCComment

   I think that's a fair point, which is why I would personally argue both stem from the same place (patriarchy) which is the real issue - misogyny and misandry can't be stopped without actually treating the root cause. The reason I don't quite agree with people saying misandry mainly stems from misogyny is because I believe they both stem from patriarchy and it's a common opinion that patriarchy only negatively affects women, which just isn't true. It negatively affects basically everyone, but because people believe the thing it stems from mainly affects women it leads to them concluding that it stems from specifically misogyny which personally I disagree with.

3. 2026-08-31 23:54 UTCComment

   not even true and post-christianity actually gave women more status that in pagan societies and matriarchal societies were still not common in the slightest.

4. 2026-08-31 23:52 UTCComment

   That seems kinda unfair to kids that don't have sisters, I don't think whether you have a sister or not actually matters that much as long as you are actually a good person. I am an only child and I respect women, and I consider myself a feminist.

5. 2026-08-31 23:46 UTCComment

   Most pro-lifers I’m familiar with would argue that, yes, if you’re not willing to raise a child with your partner, then you should not be having sex with them. This argument goes for men just as much as women; if you’re not willing to support her & raise whatever potential children may (even accidentally) result, then you shouldn’t be having sex with her. Pregnancy is not just a natural consequence of sex; it’s its biological purpose. Furthermore, intercourse isn’t like eating, breathing, or sleeping. Never has anyone ever died from not having sex. Of course, none of this is *why* pro-lifers are actually pro-life; pro-lifers believe that the unborn have just as much of a right to not be murdered as any other human.