tech

Attention over time

7-day rolling share of analyzed posts/comments mentioning this entity · 90 daily points ending 2026-10-11

Final complete day: 2026-10-11. Attention was 0.2% — this entity appeared in 39 of 20,452 analyzed posts/comments in the seven days ending that day (45 mentions).

Each point is a seven-day rolling window of complete UTC days; a point is comparable only when at least 100 analyzed posts or comments fall inside it. A day with no analyzed records counts as zero; missing coverage is marked and never shown as zero. The series ends at the latest complete analyzed day — it never extends into the current incomplete day. How attention is measured.

Recent mentions

1. 2026-10-11 14:33 UTCComment

   As someone else who works in tech, these tools have advanced massively and still require too hand holding to be hands-off. I think there’s a threshold that it’s just unable to cross. These creative uses are interesting and create a lot of buzz but it almost always seems to be 99% better in the “reveal” than in real-world use cases

2. 2026-10-11 11:41 UTCComment

   Even tech has been making small moves after results recently though

3. 2026-10-11 09:50 UTCComment

   If that’s your argument then just accept it doesn’t matter. Everything is about growth and speculative future earnings in the tech sector. At least look at PEG too if you insist on keeping PE. A company growing revenue at 40% can justify a PE of 40, its trailing PEG is a totally healthy 1. But Walmart for example having a PE of 40 with a terrible 5% a year growth is overvalued to the tits. It’s PEG is a terribly high 8. Or, I’ll also put it this way, PE is somewhat more relevant if you express it in percentiles of the company’s recent 2-3 years worth of PE values. If the current value corresponds to <50th percentile the stock is most likely slightly to highly undervalued (depending on exact percentage), though not necessarily if something in its core business changed, and if it corresponds to >50th percentile it’s most likely elevated. Also PE is not a blanket term, it is sector dependent. An energy stock carries more risk due to geopolitical vulnerability, capital intensive structure, terrible logistics and much more. Its average PE is always going to be compressed. A tech stock carries way less risk because it is capital/asset light, doesn’t have to have physical representation everywhere, is not very much affected by geopolitical tensions, and most importantly, due to almost half of all people on the planet having access to the internet it can grow rapidly. A stocks current price is composed of two parts: one is the price you pay for the value that’s currently available and proven to exist (for example earnings) and the other is the price you pay for speculation on possible future value and earnings. For most stocks in tech I’ve looked at, the first part is almost always less than or equal to the second part. Yes there is a way to proxy them and get a rough idea, Google “EPV by Bruce Greenwald”. You can use his logic to derive a current “fair price” base solely on proven earnings.

4. 2026-10-11 08:47 UTCComment

   The bubble won't pop until the entire top 15 is nothing but tech.

5. 2026-10-11 05:36 UTCComment

   The only non tech remaining on the list is Lilly and Berkshire. This is just sad that all the wealth is going towards tech only.